I eat a lot of Japanese food and though I am no Iron Chef Morimoto, I do consider myself able to discern the good from the spectacular. Kyoto's cuisine lies closer to the good range. The portions are huge (see pictures) but I find the quality so-so. The fish is fresh enough (but a little slimy). The rolls were tasty but not unlike others I have had before. The sushi rice kept falling apart (a little dry perhaps??). Would I go back? I might go and try the toro that they are advertising to be in season. But I plan to head over to Taro's Fish to pick up a fresh slice anyhow ...
In the end, I would return for the lunch special but I much rather head over to Solo / Taro for a treat. Yes, I am a sushi princess that way.
FYI, the décor is slightly dark and dated. But I don't care about that. I can eat squat-style if the food is good. The service is prompt but I had to call for the tea a few times.