About: http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/E1PfgKemHY4nPNtDwtf8GQ     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : rev:Review, within Data Space : foodie-cloud.org, foodie-cloud.org associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
type
dateCreated
itemReviewed
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#funnyReviews
rev:rating
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#usefulReviews
rev:text
  • Average price, food quality not amazing by any means, customer service a bit tricky due to language barrier. A few co-workers decided to order sushi for lunch, so I joined in. The price was not bad averaging at $1 per piece of sushi (if it's more than that, I consider it high, if it's less I consider it low, hence the "average" rating price-wise). The quality of the food was quite low, where I found the rice to be very dried out, and the piece of sashimi I ordered that came with my chirasi sushi lunch were not very fresh either. The lettuce that came with the sashimi was not at all edible due to the taste (I found it to be extremely bitter) and the salad and miso soup I found to be sub-par at best. My co-workers had to confirm the location of my work several times before the people on the phone could understand it, which can be quite frustrating. Also their ginger was served in those little pre-made packs, which I wasn't a fan of. I did however like the higher intensity of their wasabi. All-in-all, I don't see me ordering from Kumo again. I find Tokyo Sushi has comparable prices, however the quality of their sushi/sashimi is tonnes better, in my experience. Furthermore, comparing the chirasi meal between the two venues, Tokyo Sushi makes their miso soup with mushroom which I absolutely love, their rice is to die for, and 9.5 times out of 10, the quality of their fish is out of this world. I'm definitely choosing Tokyo Sushi over Kumo Sushi based on the fact that they're both more or less within the same distance from where I work.
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#coolReviews
rev:reviewer
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Sep 26 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Sep 26 2023, on Linux (x86_64-generic_glibc25-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 102 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software