rev:text
| - I recently posted a review of Curry on Murray, affording it three stars and praising the food and the service. I prominently noted in the review, however, that the restaurant is a poor value, and indicated the extraordinary value that is offered at a restaurant like India Garden, with its enormous and top-notch lunch buffet, for which one pays a mere $8.49 per person with website coupon. My Curry on Murray review elicited the following response, obviously from the owner, who misinterprets my comments:
"You must really hate us to have the exact review copied over to many websites. I'm sorry. There are reasons we don't quite see Thai or French restaurants serving buffet. Among them are perception of food and difficulties business-wise. I hope you understand."
I posted the review at this site and another, as I want potential diners to have my thoughts available to them before dining here. That is the purpose of such sites. How can a three-star review which praises the food and service mean that the reviewer hates the restaurant? Three stars, after all, means "A-OK", per Yelp. I did not indicate that Curry on Murray should offer a buffet. I merely point out the stark difference between the value that is offered at a restaurant that has a buffet and the $40+ that a modest size meal for two commanded at Curry on Murray.
|