About: http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/k4mdUaS4FEgu8SoMUwU3_w     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : rev:Review, within Data Space : foodie-cloud.org, foodie-cloud.org associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
type
dateCreated
itemReviewed
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#funnyReviews
rev:rating
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#usefulReviews
rev:text
  • Very nice staff, office is nice. My first treatment did yield good results. Though there was significant pain the first 3 weeks. The second treatment they elected to use different applicators. Charged me a ton of money and 4 months later zero results. Not happy at all w paying for that. Mixed bag. But again, nice people. But results not worth the significant investment. Update in response to staff reply to my review: The second procedure was done in late February or early March. So by the end of June it was 4 months and the results were not there. I had become concerned after 3 months the results were not going to show, so I worked on the following: -Major diet, went to vegerterian lifestyle. -Stopped any alcohol comsumption for 60 days. -Purchased a cardio machine at home which I use daily. -Went to weight loss clinic where they gave me medications and weekly shots. As a result, I lost 20 lbs since my first weigh in at your location. If I came in, you would take your photos which would show reductions in subcutaneous fat. You would then base a conclusion that your procedure is the direct cause of the fat reduction in those areas. Which then you would put in your book of photos and use as an example to other people how "well" your procedure works. The fact is, the second procedure did very little. Any loss of fat since my first procedure is due 95% to my efforts. From my experience, the results were good with the plate like applicators. Very painful recovery, but it worked well and was worth the investment. I had assumed we were using the same applicators for the second time around. Instead, your team used the suction kind. They do not freeze anywhere near the same volume of fat. But you charge the same amount for something that does not do as much. There was no pain or discomfort during or after the procedure. No itching, no numbness...which leads me to believe it did not work. Going in to have you take pictures of me does not make the procedure work better. So saying I did not come in June, July, etc has no bearing on my results. You charged me $4K for something that did not work. For anyone considering the procedure, first see what applicator they will use. In my experience, the suction kind do very little if anything. When looking at the photos any Cool Sculpting provider shows you of other patients, keep in mind those people just paid thousands of dollars for the procedure. Thus, its highly likely they are dieting and exercising more due to the investment and to see results. Not many people will pay that and keep their diet and exercise levels the same as they were pre-procedure. Also, if a provider says they have done thousands of procedures, thats great. But their books of clients may only show 50 or so. So if a provider did 5000 procedures and their book is showing 50 client examples, thats 1% of their work. 1 client out of 100 made that book, you are looking at the top 1% of results. If you are already skinny and just looking for a small reduction in an area, then maybe this is for you. But if you are 30 maybe 40 lbs over weight and want some reduction, look at liposuction. In the end it costs less than what I did and the pain/ recovery was about the same. And with lipo you will get clear results where there is no grey area.
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#coolReviews
rev:reviewer
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Sep 26 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Sep 26 2023, on Linux (x86_64-generic_glibc25-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 87 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software