About: http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/UeaA5kaaqC8sdCuPqZujmg     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : rev:Review, within Data Space : foodie-cloud.org, foodie-cloud.org associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
type
dateCreated
itemReviewed
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#funnyReviews
rev:rating
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#usefulReviews
rev:text
  • Here's the big question. Midwood or Sauceman's? Oh that could prompt an endless debate. So here's my take: Midwood is the more pretentious, hipster-esque BBQ joint. This is where I'd bring a friend who I'd like to impress with a cool BBQ spot and share a few local beers. Whereas Sauceman's feels more casual and relaxed. Almost like eating at a pit stop. This is where I'd bring a friend who just likes eating BBQ. Midwood is BBQ on a creative slant. Burgers and tacos ... that's beyond the simplified offerings from the pit. Bacon-wrapped jalapeño is delicious but ... that's just fixin's dolled up. But don't get me wrong. I can gnosh on these bacon jalapeño's all day. Whereas Sauceman's is BBQ plain and simple. The red slaw is a perfect digestive to the heaping amount of pulled pork you'd be served. The hush puppies balances out the BBQ tray by offering you something mealy savor. In a pure side-to-side comparison of solely the pulled pork (ignoring every other meat and side), I'd give the edge to Sauceman's. Even when absolutely stuffed, I just couldn't put down the fork. I just kept eating and eating. Again, the red slaw helps tremendously. But Midwood is legitimately good on its own right. Briskets were above average. Ribs about average. Sides were above average. Come on .... 508 reviews can't be wrong. It's the most popular place in all of Charlotte. Of course you'll come and you'll love it too. If you took everything in consideration, Midwood and Sauceman's ends up being a tie in my book. BBQ Hop 2015 #2 [March 2015]
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#coolReviews
rev:reviewer
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Sep 26 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Sep 26 2023, on Linux (x86_64-generic_glibc25-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 83 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software