About: http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/MzvIKxgGyQsPu9vio5RL5Q     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : rev:Review, within Data Space : foodie-cloud.org, foodie-cloud.org associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
type
dateCreated
itemReviewed
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#funnyReviews
rev:rating
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#usefulReviews
rev:text
  • Yes the door says "Eyelash Extensions" but if you are even thinking about it, RUN in the other direction and do not torture your eyes. I'll admit it was new years eve and i was driving by and happen to see the sign and had not had time to go to my regular place. I prefer the 3 lash "flares" versus the individual lash extensions because they are easier, less expensive, faster and not as delicate as the singles. Usually 10-15 little flares, with a little dot of glue is perfect for a glam look without spending 2 hours in the chair and $200. $35-45 is the going rate, 30-40 minutes for application for flares. Normally since there are only a few glue dots versus almost every lash having glue, they are more comfortable. the price and time was correct, but the application was HORRIBLE. I'm not even sure how to explain it. The result was like taking 4 lash STRIPS, gluing them together with rubber cement and then gluing them to your skin at the lash line. Tiffany did put flares on me, but she put so many, and used so much glue, and glued each piece to each other and to my skin it was so painful. They were thick and horrible and un-natural looking and did not even cover the length of my eyelid. There were so many lashes and so much glue that I could see them like I was wearing a black visor pulled down over my eyes. The way they were glued to my lash line skin was pulling my eyelid up so I could see the inner rim of my eye in the mirror. I could not even close my eyes the entire way, so when I showered, water was getting in my eyes because they would not close because the glue was pulling my eyelid up. The glue was THICK and HARD and went from my lash line more than half way down the lashes and like a 1/4" thick. In the inner corner of my eye, one of my natural lashes was pulled and caught into the glue so hard, it was hurting. I finally had to pick at the glue on my skin to release it and it bled. I managed to drink enough alcohol that night to withstand the discomfort. New years day they were closed, so I went back the next day to see if they could be removed. It took 30 minutes for her to spackle them on, and 2 hours to take them off. There was so much glue, even her solvent would not release them. I was terrified as she was picking an scratching at my eyes and lids with sharp objects trying to release them. I heard scissors clipping also, but did not care. After 2 hours of soaking and picking and pulling I was finally free. The release from the pain, and fear of her poking my eyeball or burning it with solvent, finally let go and I bawled like a baby. It wasn't till then that she said "sorry" . Of course when I looked in the mirror 70% of my natural eye lashes are gone, pulled out or cut off. the rims of my eyes were red and swollen from the torture of 3 days. These practices are improper and dangerous, and if I knew how to report this place I would. For an impulse moment of stopping in, I could have lost my eyesight as this girl could have seriously damaged my eyeballs. I love the glam look of fluttery eyelashes, but its not worth this kind of pain and suffering. I caution anyone visiting this salon as with this level of un-professionalism and lack of skill, you are putting yourself in danger visiting here. Like I said RUN in the opposite direction and never set foot in here if you value your health and safety.
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#coolReviews
rev:reviewer
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Sep 26 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Sep 26 2023, on Linux (x86_64-generic_glibc25-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 102 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software