About: http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/MeUWNVQW4pMk_9mkZZ7pFQ     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : rev:Review, within Data Space : foodie-cloud.org, foodie-cloud.org associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
type
dateCreated
itemReviewed
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#funnyReviews
rev:rating
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#usefulReviews
rev:text
  • I'm mostly reiterating what other have said but with a few additions. General - Bad ventilation. With Pittsburgh humidity, it gets hot. - Wooden walls, so there's not a lot of grip for smearing = Price for a day pass is reasonable, but fees for little things like a belay device and chalk add up instead of holding an id for collateral. Bouldering area + Decent number of routes and variety - Stiff trampoline floor. Movable pads are big and effective but they aren't everywhere Top rope area -The top rope area is a different section of the building and even has different hours from the bouldering area, which is weird. - Ratings are labeled as Easy, Moderate, and Hard with +/-. Why not put real YDS ratings? - For whatever reason, the ropes are just draped over a pole without any loops, so you don't get much friction while lowering. Therefore, they require the belayer to anchor into the floor for each top rope. Not a big deal, I just haven't seen that requirement in a gym before. - Nonsensical rules. I got in trouble for helping my partner go over the safety checks. I passed the belay test, but I was explicitly told not to teach my partner how to perform the safety checks as a climber so I could belay him. I was told this was for insurance purposes as they don't want anyone but the employees teaching. I waited for the employee to look away so I could safely set up a top rope. Discouraging learning seems like a bad idea to me. Maybe I'm just spoiled by the great climbing gyms in San Francisco where I live but there are enough easily remedied flaws that led me to such a low rating.
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#coolReviews
rev:reviewer
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Sep 26 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Sep 26 2023, on Linux (x86_64-generic_glibc25-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 115 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software