About: http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/9MpfuFo1iMmV25QOTaWBOw     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : rev:Review, within Data Space : foodie-cloud.org, foodie-cloud.org associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
type
dateCreated
itemReviewed
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#funnyReviews
rev:rating
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#usefulReviews
rev:text
  • Here is a link to my review of Swish on Spring Mountain: http://www.yelp.com/biz/swish-shabu-shabu-las-vegas#hrid:YOPirmCw-TCvwTfeKbLMww Now that may seem like a cheap way to start a review, but after dining at this Sahara Swish last night (thanks to seeing Misti Y.'s review!) I can safely say that both places offered me the same quality of food. I will say though, the staff at this location was much more attentive and checked on the customers more often. However, that can also be a side effect of how the restaurant is set up, with your hot pot sitting on the inside of the counter space; so it's up to the employees to control the heat of your stove. A little odd since I think I'd rather have control over it, but in the end it didn't affect my meal or experience. Referencing my original review, I started off by saying, "This place is now on my list of, "I don't care if I ate this earlier this week, I'll eat this again tonight!" foods." And that statement stills rings true. I ate at the Spring Mountain Swish for lunch on Thursday (enjoyed their Mushroom Party, which is a great name for a dish), and dined here at the Sahara Swish for dinner on Friday (and, gasp, got the Vegetarian Delight!). Although the major obvious difference between Swish on Spring Mountain and Swish on Sahara is the setup, another difference is that they are managed by different people. I'm not up to snuff on the whole background story, but even with different owners, you can find me at either location. Whichever happens to be closest at the time!
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#coolReviews
rev:reviewer
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Sep 26 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Sep 26 2023, on Linux (x86_64-generic_glibc25-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 111 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software