About: http://data.yelp.com/Review/id/Pq4eP-83MfL9Vu7PPDa5og     Goto   Sponge   Distinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : rev:Review, within Data Space : foodie-cloud.org, foodie-cloud.org associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
type
dateCreated
itemReviewed
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#funnyReviews
rev:rating
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#usefulReviews
rev:text
  • I tried this last week, and I must say that I was severely disappointed. I've read so many good things about this buffet and when they first opened up, I definitely wanted to try it due to the reviews & price. However, the price started to go up and up and when I went, it was already $46 per. It's not the price issue -- it really isn't. I'm not afraid to pay for something that's worth my while. Heck, the wait wasn't even an issue either. I've wanted 4+ hours for other buffets. It's just I don't think the Bacchanal Buffet left an impression on me. However, I do LOVE their rack of lambs. It was perfectly cooked and it was juicy/tender. It wasn't dry at all like how some places cook them. Another thing I loved was their personal soup bowl of "Black Chicken w/ Ginseng" at the Chinese corner. The ramen was good as well. The soup base for it was pretty decent and light rather than heavy. Other than those three, there wasn't much to celebrate about or brag about. I felt, in my opinion, that there wasn't enough variety. There wasn't really anything that screamed at me to try it. I didn't feel as though my $46+tax+tip was justified. It was a great experience, they had great service, and they were good .. but just not what I'd imagine it to be. The dessert section wasn't all that great either. I feel as though Wynn's buffet or the M Resort (Studio B) would be a better selection. Though their dessert section beats Wynn's dessert section. I would say try it for the experience but it's nothing "that" great.
http://www.openvoc.eu/poi#coolReviews
rev:reviewer
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Sep 26 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Sep 26 2023, on Linux (x86_64-generic_glibc25-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 86 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software